<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Waiting to Exhale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nicholls.edu/bastiatsbastions/2006/11/29/waiting-to-exhale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nicholls.edu/bastiatsbastions/2006/11/29/waiting-to-exhale/</link>
	<description>What is seen and what is unseen.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 03:23:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chad</title>
		<link>http://www.nicholls.edu/bastiatsbastions/2006/11/29/waiting-to-exhale/comment-page-1/#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicholls.edu/bastiatsbastions/2006/11/29/waiting-to-exhale/#comment-730</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t read the last article, but I hope it is not a follow up to Earl&#039;s comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read the last article, but I hope it is not a follow up to Earl&#8217;s comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morris Coats</title>
		<link>http://www.nicholls.edu/bastiatsbastions/2006/11/29/waiting-to-exhale/comment-page-1/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>Morris Coats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 05:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicholls.edu/bastiatsbastions/2006/11/29/waiting-to-exhale/#comment-729</guid>
		<description>I just came across this and thought it was appropriate.  The biggest cuplrit in greenhouse gas production, says this report, is not Man, but Bovine: http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/article2062484.ece</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just came across this and thought it was appropriate.  The biggest cuplrit in greenhouse gas production, says this report, is not Man, but Bovine: <a href="http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/article2062484.ece" rel="nofollow">http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/article2062484.ece</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Charpentier</title>
		<link>http://www.nicholls.edu/bastiatsbastions/2006/11/29/waiting-to-exhale/comment-page-1/#comment-685</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Charpentier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 05:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicholls.edu/bastiatsbastions/2006/11/29/waiting-to-exhale/#comment-685</guid>
		<description>Hello and let me begin by saying that I do not take a stand for either side of this matter.  However, I will attack the proposed platform that C02 is contributing to &quot;Global Warming&quot;.  Global Warming was introduced as a phenomenom that was essentially caused by humans lack of regard to nature.  Let me posed this question to you as a person who had to walk to class in Va&#039; s dredful cold winter.  Don&#039;t you like warmer weather?  I personally really like warm weather and would be pefectly content with it remaining a balmy 72 year round.  Billions and billions of dollars have been dedicated to prove that Global Warming is degrading our planet.  BUT recent research has shown that the glacier are NOT melting at an alamzing pace,  the oceans temperatures are NOT rising dramatically and for the most part life on Earth is good.  Now, don&#039;t you think a notion of limiting CO2 emmisions, even in large industrial areas, is a radical idea.  How about we just let the satus qoa continue while we consumers enjoy the luxury of life with cheaper goods produced by those CO2 emitting fiends.

Jacob Charpentier Econ 255 2M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello and let me begin by saying that I do not take a stand for either side of this matter.  However, I will attack the proposed platform that C02 is contributing to &#8220;Global Warming&#8221;.  Global Warming was introduced as a phenomenom that was essentially caused by humans lack of regard to nature.  Let me posed this question to you as a person who had to walk to class in Va&#8217; s dredful cold winter.  Don&#8217;t you like warmer weather?  I personally really like warm weather and would be pefectly content with it remaining a balmy 72 year round.  Billions and billions of dollars have been dedicated to prove that Global Warming is degrading our planet.  BUT recent research has shown that the glacier are NOT melting at an alamzing pace,  the oceans temperatures are NOT rising dramatically and for the most part life on Earth is good.  Now, don&#8217;t you think a notion of limiting CO2 emmisions, even in large industrial areas, is a radical idea.  How about we just let the satus qoa continue while we consumers enjoy the luxury of life with cheaper goods produced by those CO2 emitting fiends.</p>
<p>Jacob Charpentier Econ 255 2M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takerra Ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.nicholls.edu/bastiatsbastions/2006/11/29/waiting-to-exhale/comment-page-1/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>Takerra Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 03:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicholls.edu/bastiatsbastions/2006/11/29/waiting-to-exhale/#comment-630</guid>
		<description>Elimimating breathing is a very extreme way of dealing with the problem of CO2. I am sure there are other ways for them to control the emmisions without going to such an extreme level. If several large businesses are willing to back the regulation then I think everyone should at least be willing to try. I mean it can&#039;t get any worse by trying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elimimating breathing is a very extreme way of dealing with the problem of CO2. I am sure there are other ways for them to control the emmisions without going to such an extreme level. If several large businesses are willing to back the regulation then I think everyone should at least be willing to try. I mean it can&#8217;t get any worse by trying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: morris.coats</title>
		<link>http://www.nicholls.edu/bastiatsbastions/2006/11/29/waiting-to-exhale/comment-page-1/#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator>morris.coats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicholls.edu/bastiatsbastions/2006/11/29/waiting-to-exhale/#comment-623</guid>
		<description>Hi Earl,

I am not sure.  If they would only ban the hot air that comes from D.C., I would be pleased, except that they would have the power, then, to also ban the hot air from White Hall at Nicholls. I just don&#039;t see the point in reducing emissions of a GLOBAL pollutant in just one country (or one state, such as CA) would do anything to reduce global warming.

Morris Coats</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Earl,</p>
<p>I am not sure.  If they would only ban the hot air that comes from D.C., I would be pleased, except that they would have the power, then, to also ban the hot air from White Hall at Nicholls. I just don&#8217;t see the point in reducing emissions of a GLOBAL pollutant in just one country (or one state, such as CA) would do anything to reduce global warming.</p>
<p>Morris Coats</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaila Theriot</title>
		<link>http://www.nicholls.edu/bastiatsbastions/2006/11/29/waiting-to-exhale/comment-page-1/#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaila Theriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 22:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicholls.edu/bastiatsbastions/2006/11/29/waiting-to-exhale/#comment-619</guid>
		<description>The government can&#039;t go so far as banning breathing, but I&#039;m sure something will go through concerning big businesses and vehicles. If Walmart can limit it&#039;s CO2 emissions, why can&#039;t everyone else? Sooner or later, they will have to. As the article stated, walmart sees which way the wind is blowing, and how fast the ice is melting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The government can&#8217;t go so far as banning breathing, but I&#8217;m sure something will go through concerning big businesses and vehicles. If Walmart can limit it&#8217;s CO2 emissions, why can&#8217;t everyone else? Sooner or later, they will have to. As the article stated, walmart sees which way the wind is blowing, and how fast the ice is melting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.nicholls.edu/bastiatsbastions/2006/11/29/waiting-to-exhale/comment-page-1/#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 22:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicholls.edu/bastiatsbastions/2006/11/29/waiting-to-exhale/#comment-617</guid>
		<description>Does this mean the government will be banning sex and other forms of heavy breathing if this thing goes through?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean the government will be banning sex and other forms of heavy breathing if this thing goes through?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
