Comments on: The problem of the OC in LP http://www.nicholls.edu/bastiatsbastions/2007/02/15/the-problem-of-the-oc-in-lp/ What is seen and what is unseen. Fri, 19 Feb 2010 03:23:56 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: WB http://www.nicholls.edu/bastiatsbastions/2007/02/15/the-problem-of-the-oc-in-lp/comment-page-1/#comment-1297 WB Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:09:04 +0000 http://www.nicholls.edu/bastiatsbastions/2007/02/15/the-problem-of-the-oc-in-lp/#comment-1297 I know with every dissatisfied employee you have, that makes them work less. Since they don't work as much, there co-worker pushes them less. It's a chain reaction in any work place. Unless you give the employee an incentive and opportunities, they aren't going to work as hard and the further you fall behind in your production (in this case, clean up). So why don't the local government find a way to pay to keep the employees happy. After all, if the competitors (local businesses), can afford to pay a guy $18 an hour, then they are obviously making enough revenue to pay for the clean-up and drainage of their local community. Not doing so would just cause them to doante more money to the cleanup and recovery process after, which in turn puts us behind in production again. However, one question that does bother me is, why should the LG (local goverment) worry so much about the drainage backup as it is the low income areas that get backed up. They are keeping up the areas that make the money for the community. To me, it is the same problem the local community is facing with teachers. Don't want to pay them enough, how ever you expect to get the best and keep the best employees to educate the future of the local community. I know with every dissatisfied employee you have, that makes them work less. Since they don’t work as much, there co-worker pushes them less. It’s a chain reaction in any work place. Unless you give the employee an incentive and opportunities, they aren’t going to work as hard and the further you fall behind in your production (in this case, clean up).

So why don’t the local government find a way to pay to keep the employees happy. After all, if the competitors (local businesses), can afford to pay a guy $18 an hour, then they are obviously making enough revenue to pay for the clean-up and drainage of their local community. Not doing so would just cause them to doante more money to the cleanup and recovery process after, which in turn puts us behind in production again.

However, one question that does bother me is, why should the LG (local goverment) worry so much about the drainage backup as it is the low income areas that get backed up. They are keeping up the areas that make the money for the community.

To me, it is the same problem the local community is facing with teachers. Don’t want to pay them enough, how ever you expect to get the best and keep the best employees to educate the future of the local community.

]]>