|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Price Discrimination Ain’t Necessarily Bad
- Saga of Ed Sykes
- 3 Conditions for Price Discrimination
- Price Discrimination and Elasticity in Different Markets
- Profit Maximization Requires Setting MRN = MRS ,
NOT PN = PS
- Variety of Price Discrimination
|
|
3
|
- An example—financial aid for less fortunate students
- More units traded under price discrimination
- More combined producer and consumer surplus—more efficient than single
pricing, but also more producer surplus (profit).
|
|
4
|
- Empty Seats Where Profits “Maximized” – Could sell to some at lower
price, but higher than marginal costs, and would add to profit, But…
- Might “cannibalize” sales made at higher prices
- Assumption so far about Price Searchers: All Units Sold at Same Price,
to sell more have to lower price on ALL units for sale.
- Does it have to be this way?
- Sell at different prices to different buyers--Price discrimination
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- 1. Must be Price Searcher (or must have market power) – Price Takers do
not have to reduce price to sell more!
- 2. Must be able to identify, tell apart, price sensitive and price
insensitive buyers — Price sensitivity is Price Elasticity
- 3. Must be able to keep buyers from re-selling good -- Services are hard
to re-sell! Can turn durable
goods into services by leasing instead of selling.
- Example: M*A*S*H and Pricing
Appendectomies
|
|
7
|
- MR = P – (D P / DQ)* Q =
P (1 – 1/e)
- MC= MR (Profit Maximization Rule)
- MC = P(1 – 1/e) in EACH market
- Suppose MC = 10, eN = 2 in market N, and eS = 5 in
market S (N & S could be North market and South market,
geographically different, or just some other differences in buyers
associated with different elasticities of demand—young/elderly,
faculty/students)
|
|
8
|
- 10 = PN (1 – 1/eN) 10 = PS (1 –
1/eS)
- eN = 2 in market N, and eS = 5 in market S
- 10 = PN (1 – ½), so 10 = PN (½), so 20 = PN
- 10 = PS (1 – 1/5), so 10 = PS (4/5),
- so 12.5=PS
- So, higher price in market with lower elasticity of demand
|
|
9
|
- IF MRN > MRS or
MRN < MRS not Profit Maximizing
- Suppose MRN > MRS, that MRN = 10, MRS
= 5
- If we sell one more unit in market N and one less in Market S, overall
costs are the same, BUT
- Another unit sold in market N adds $10 to revenue, revenue given up in
market S is $5:
- Selling one more in N and one less in S raises Revenues by $5, doesn’t
change costs
- Profits not maximized if MRs not equal.
|
|
10
|
- Financial Aid depends on “affordability” of college for family, more
aid, lower prices, for those who cannot otherwise afford it
- Senior Discounts (fixed incomes lead to greater price sensitivity)
- Super Saver Airfare
- Coupons—coupon clippers more price sensitive than non-clippers, more
price sensitive are self-selected, self-identified
|